Although many Americans may never have heard of the Law of the Sea Treaty and those who did know about it probably thought it was dead on arrival in the U.S. Senate a couple of year ago, are in for a shock. Yes, the Creature from the Ocean’s Floor, better known as the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) is back and it is rearing its ugly, globalist head once again. The LOST is a national sovereignty-killing creature created by supporters of the New World Order who also want the United Nations to ultimately be the one and only world government. It is specifically designed to destroy the sovereignty of all nations, to limit the rights of their citizens and take control over the majority of the earth’s resources in the oceans, including those within America’s territorial waters. The enemies of Liberty and Freedom have created a monster that poses more of a danger to America’s sovereignty and to our individual Freedoms and Liberty than any foreign military force ever has and we must be prepared to kill the creature before it kills us.
The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) was first conceived in the early 1980’s by the United Nations as a method for them to gain control of most of the activities on, over, and beneath the ocean's surface. The fundamental premise of the Law of the Sea Treaty is that the resources on the ocean's floor belong to all of the people of the world and those resources should be protected and controlled by an international organization like the United Nations. Although that may sound like a noble goal, in order to achieve this goal, the United Nations has created a multinational, bureaucratic creature called the International Seabed Authority ("ISA") and charged this entity with regulating and controlling the world’s mineral resources in the oceans.
When President Reagan was president, he objected to several of the treaty’s provisions that would have resulted in surrendering our nation’s sovereignty and refused to sign it, but that didn’t stop the proponents of world government and the New World Order. In 1994, the “progressives (a nice term used to describe communists) at the United Nations decided to keep moving forward with their plans by creating a diversion they called an “Agreement of Implementation” that was supposed to address the concerns of the United States and other industrialized nations. It didn’t change anything. This new agreement was all smoke and mirrors, but our Oxford educated, globalist president Bill Clinton signed it anyway. The Senate, however, refused to ratify it, as required by the U.S. Constitution.
Proposed regulations in the new Law of the Sea Treaty will require private companies that want to conduct exploration and mining operations in international waters to submit substantial application fees to the UN’s International Seabed Authority (ISA), which in turn would allow the ISA to use these application fees to partially pay for its own mining efforts through its own mining subsidy, called the Enterprise. Corporations from member nations operating in international waters would have to pay annual fees and even be taxed to pay a percentage of their profits to the ISA. These corporations would also be expected to share their mining and navigational technology with third world countries to ensure that opportunities aren't restricted to more technologically advanced. This is insane. The decision to grant or to withhold mining permits in international waters would now be decided by unelected, globalist bureaucrats at the United Nation’s International Seabed Authority (ISA).
The Treaty would essentially give the United Nations, a notoriously corrupt, anti-American, anti-capitalist and un-democratic organization, the power to assert control over 70% of the earth’s surface.
Using the regulations issued by the ISA, the United Nations would now be given the power to levy international fees and taxes on American companies. Mining approvals would be highly politicized and could discriminate against American operators. The United Nations would be given the power to regulate ocean research, exploration, fishing, marine environmental protection and navigation. They could even impose production quotas and licensing requirements on American fishermen operating in international waters.
The United Nations, through the ISA, would be given the power to create an international court system to render and enforce its judgments! This new system would lie outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. legal system and the U.S. Constitution, leaving American citizens and businesses at the mercy of international tribunals whose corrupt UN bureaucrats could subject them to Sharia Law or other non-Western legal traditions.
The Treaty calls for prosperous member nations like the United States to provide financial and technical assistance not only to developing countries, but also to "people who have not attained full independence or other self-governing status" (codeword for groups such as the Palestinians).
The Treaty would do irreparable harm to U.S. military and intelligence operations and would force the United States to hand over proprietary technology to less developed third-world countries, many of whom are actively hostile to U.S. interests. Giving up the U.S. Navy’s long established primary mission of “maintaining freedom of the seas for all” and handing it over to a historically corrupt organization like the United Nations should be unthinkable.
The most important objection concerns Article 314 of The Law of the Sea Treaty (located in Part XVII) that empowers the LOST member Assembly, dominated by nations of the developing world, to amend the terms of the treaty over the objection of any individual member state. In other words, the terms of the treaty could be changed significantly and the United States would have to abide by those changes without the U.S. Senate having the opportunity to consent to the changes. This undermines U.S. sovereignty and is clearly unconstitutional.
The Law of the Sea Treaty creates a new United Nations’ worldwide bureaucracy that will create a whole new restrictive system of destructive environmental regulations that would be costly and counter-productive to American businesses, while at the same time, handing over the hard-earned, American taxpayer money to many of our enemies.
The socialists, Marxists, globalists and other supporters of the New World Order keep pushing for this treaty. Senator Harry Reid has indicated that he might reintroduce the treaty in the Senate for a vote in the near future and Barack Obama, our socialist President, who is a long term advocate of the Law of the Sea Treaty, has indicated that he will sign it if passed by the Senate.
I ask American citizens to contact their U.S. Senators and urge them to review Article 314 of the Law of the Sea Treaty and Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, before they vote on the ratification of this treaty. Our Constitution requires that two thirds of our Senate must approve any treaty. When changes to any treaties are made, our Senators have the authority and responsibility to review those changes and not surrender our sovereignty to UN bureaucrats and foreign governments.
This Creature from the Ocean’s Floor, better known as the Law of the Sea Treaty, has been created and written specifically to undercut America’s sovereignty and move us towards global governance and a New World Order where the constitutional rights of the American people, our national sovereignty and the military power of the United States would be subordinated to the whims of a group of corrupt, unelected, third-world bureaucrats who have no interest in Liberty or Freedom.
My fellow Americans, it’s time to kill this Creature from the Ocean’s Floor once and for all. I firmly believe that any U.S. Senator who knowingly votes to ratify this new version of the Law of the Sea Treaty, which contains articles that threaten our nation’s sovereignty, that deliberately subordinates the United States Constitution to globalist, international laws, that authorizes the international taxation of our citizens, and that is designed to severely limit the Liberty and Freedoms enjoyed by American Citizens under the U.S. Constitution, is guilty of Treason.
I also believe that it is now time to cut off the ‘Serpent’s Head of the New World Order’ affectionately called the United Nations by the globalist, communist Elite who have been using the UN as part of their plan to destroy us.
It’s time that we get out of the United Nations, cut off their funding, seize the UN property in America under federal RICO statutes (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization) and give them their Eviction notice.
Link to the Original Article: www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com/article_323_31836
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Saturday, April 28, 2012
THE REPUBLICANS AND THE OBAMA ELIGIBILITY ISSUE
Recent studies have shown that almost half of registered voters in the United States, no longer believe that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is authentic. In addition to this belief, the first official U.S. law enforcement investigation into the matter by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County Arizona has clearly established that Barack Obama’s birth document released by the White House on April 27, 2011 is a multi-layer, computer generated forgery. The last I heard, forgery is still a crime. If an illegal alien or a plain old criminal used a forged birth certificate for personal or monetary gain, or to obtain federal employment, he would be charged with the felony crime of Forgery.
Has anyone recently heard the national Republican Party leaders, Republican congressional leadership, any of the remaining presidential candidates, or the national media speaking out about the compelling technical evidence uncovered by the Arizona Sheriff’s investigative team to conclude that the birth certificate image White House officials uploaded on the White House website on April 27, 2011, did not originate in a paper format, but was rather created (forged) as an Adobe electronic file on a computer? Yet, the Republican leadership in this country, both in and out of elective office, has refused to pursue this constitutional issue as well as the apparent criminal violation of our laws. Why?
Investigation by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office also determined that the social security number that Barack Obama is using belonged to a now deceased Connecticut man who happened to die in Hawaii when Obama’s grandmother worked in the probate office and would have access to that man’s number and other information. The social security number currently used by the president has also been checked against the national E-Verify system to see if it is a legitimate number and it comes back as a fraudulent number. Using a false social security number is a federal crime. Yet, the Republican leadership in this country has refused to pursue this constitutional issue as well as the apparent criminal violation of our laws. Why?
Investigation by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has also found out that the stamp on Mr. Obama’s selective service card appears to be a forgery, but the Selective Service has refused to cooperate with the Sheriff’s Office or produce the original document for review by experts. Has any Republican party leader or elected official spoken out about this possible additional crime that has been committed by using a forged stamp on the president’s Selective Service registration card, or the refusal of a federal government agency to cooperate in a criminal investigation?
Have you heard Republican Party leaders or Republican elective officials speaking out about the discovery by Sheriff Arpaio’s investigative team that immigration files in the National Archives recording overseas arrivals into Hawaii are missing from the week of Obama’s 1961 birthday? Or about the retired mailman’s affidavit attesting that the mother of ex-Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers enthusiastically told him that she helped pay for “foreign student” Barack Obama’s education. Why the silence?
Even in the UK, people are questioning Obama’s eligibility. Lord Christopher Monckton, the former policy adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, recently said of Obama: “What he has done on the White House website is he has put up a document which he is plainly a forgery and I would regard that as a very serious matter.” Monckton added. “The point is that if I were you, I would want to make absolutely sure that he was born (in America) before allowing him to be elected. And the birth certificate that he put up on that website, I don’t know where he was born. But I do know that birth certificate isn’t genuine.” Why doesn’t the Republican leadership in this country also consider it a serious matter?
At a recent meeting of the Red Mountain Tea Party, Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., was asked by a reporter, Tom Ballantyne, that in light of all of the information coming forward regarding the forged and missing documents concerning Mr. Obama’s background, if he thought Mr. Obama was still eligible to be president. In a typical professional politician answer, Rep. Flake said: “I think Mr. Obama is our president. I think he was duly elected, and I believe he is a citizen. And I do believe the eligibility question is a distraction,” Flake added. “My job is to make sure we beat him in November.”
I find it hard to believe that Barack Obama is still refusing to provide proper documents regarding his identity, or any other background information, six months before the next presidential election and that the Republican party and Republican congressional leaders refuse to even talk about the issue. We know nothing about this man. Mr. Obama was in Pakistan in the early 1980’s when that country was listed as a terrorist state and Americans were not allowed to travel there. He obviously could not have been there on an American passport and there is no record of him having an American passport at that time. How did he get there and what passport was he using?
It is the sworn duty of Congress to uphold the Constitution and hold the executive branch accountable to the people. Why aren’t the Republicans in congress investigating this? How come some federal agencies aren’t investigating? We are dealing with clear violations of federal laws here. Why are the Republicans and everybody else avoiding the issue? Is it because the president is Black that they are afraid to take on this issue because they will be called racists?
The Republican Party is letting the Democrat-Socialist Party and their cohorts in the American liberal media control the issue. Their strategy is a simple one. It is clearly in line with the teachings of American communist Saul Alinsky, who instructs his fellow communists to marginalize anyone who brings up an issue that hurts their cause. As most people know, those who question Mr. Obama’s legitimacy to meet the requirements of the office of the President of the United States are routinely called “Birthers,” “Racists,” “Conspiracy Nuts” or some other derogatory names, which is right out of Saul Alinsky’s communist playbook ‘Rules for Radicals.’ Mr. Obama’s eligibility is a legitimate issue from the standpoint of what the Constitution says in Article 2. The apparent multiple uses of forged documents are criminal actions, not minor discrepancies to be ignored and should never be considered, as Rep Flake said, just “a distraction.”
I think that both the American media and the Republican Party’s national leadership are ignoring this issue for some unknown reason and both institutions are doing great harm to the foundation of our constitutional republic by marginalizing and ignoring the criminal and unconstitutional violations, and then attacking anyone who dares to bring up this very important issue.
The Republican candidate for president, whoever he or she may be, as well as the Republican Party and our Republican elected officials must be willing to stand tall on this issue. The Republican candidate for president must publically and with great fanfare produce an all encompassing release for all his birth, educational, financial and government employment records and demand that Barack Obama do the same and hammer him on this issue.
The Republicans also need to drop their limp-wristed, weakling-type approach to the criminal use of forged documents by the president of the United States and come out fighting with a “Jesse Ventura - no holds barred” type of attack on the issue. The law-abiding, constitutional supporting people of America are waiting for the Republicans to do something about it.
If the Republican presidential candidate, the Republican Party at the national level and our Republican elected officials fail to take any action on this issue in 2012, then the people will know that the fix is in and the American Republic is in deeper trouble than we previously thought.
Has anyone recently heard the national Republican Party leaders, Republican congressional leadership, any of the remaining presidential candidates, or the national media speaking out about the compelling technical evidence uncovered by the Arizona Sheriff’s investigative team to conclude that the birth certificate image White House officials uploaded on the White House website on April 27, 2011, did not originate in a paper format, but was rather created (forged) as an Adobe electronic file on a computer? Yet, the Republican leadership in this country, both in and out of elective office, has refused to pursue this constitutional issue as well as the apparent criminal violation of our laws. Why?
Investigation by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office also determined that the social security number that Barack Obama is using belonged to a now deceased Connecticut man who happened to die in Hawaii when Obama’s grandmother worked in the probate office and would have access to that man’s number and other information. The social security number currently used by the president has also been checked against the national E-Verify system to see if it is a legitimate number and it comes back as a fraudulent number. Using a false social security number is a federal crime. Yet, the Republican leadership in this country has refused to pursue this constitutional issue as well as the apparent criminal violation of our laws. Why?
Investigation by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has also found out that the stamp on Mr. Obama’s selective service card appears to be a forgery, but the Selective Service has refused to cooperate with the Sheriff’s Office or produce the original document for review by experts. Has any Republican party leader or elected official spoken out about this possible additional crime that has been committed by using a forged stamp on the president’s Selective Service registration card, or the refusal of a federal government agency to cooperate in a criminal investigation?
Have you heard Republican Party leaders or Republican elective officials speaking out about the discovery by Sheriff Arpaio’s investigative team that immigration files in the National Archives recording overseas arrivals into Hawaii are missing from the week of Obama’s 1961 birthday? Or about the retired mailman’s affidavit attesting that the mother of ex-Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers enthusiastically told him that she helped pay for “foreign student” Barack Obama’s education. Why the silence?
Even in the UK, people are questioning Obama’s eligibility. Lord Christopher Monckton, the former policy adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, recently said of Obama: “What he has done on the White House website is he has put up a document which he is plainly a forgery and I would regard that as a very serious matter.” Monckton added. “The point is that if I were you, I would want to make absolutely sure that he was born (in America) before allowing him to be elected. And the birth certificate that he put up on that website, I don’t know where he was born. But I do know that birth certificate isn’t genuine.” Why doesn’t the Republican leadership in this country also consider it a serious matter?
At a recent meeting of the Red Mountain Tea Party, Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., was asked by a reporter, Tom Ballantyne, that in light of all of the information coming forward regarding the forged and missing documents concerning Mr. Obama’s background, if he thought Mr. Obama was still eligible to be president. In a typical professional politician answer, Rep. Flake said: “I think Mr. Obama is our president. I think he was duly elected, and I believe he is a citizen. And I do believe the eligibility question is a distraction,” Flake added. “My job is to make sure we beat him in November.”
I find it hard to believe that Barack Obama is still refusing to provide proper documents regarding his identity, or any other background information, six months before the next presidential election and that the Republican party and Republican congressional leaders refuse to even talk about the issue. We know nothing about this man. Mr. Obama was in Pakistan in the early 1980’s when that country was listed as a terrorist state and Americans were not allowed to travel there. He obviously could not have been there on an American passport and there is no record of him having an American passport at that time. How did he get there and what passport was he using?
It is the sworn duty of Congress to uphold the Constitution and hold the executive branch accountable to the people. Why aren’t the Republicans in congress investigating this? How come some federal agencies aren’t investigating? We are dealing with clear violations of federal laws here. Why are the Republicans and everybody else avoiding the issue? Is it because the president is Black that they are afraid to take on this issue because they will be called racists?
The Republican Party is letting the Democrat-Socialist Party and their cohorts in the American liberal media control the issue. Their strategy is a simple one. It is clearly in line with the teachings of American communist Saul Alinsky, who instructs his fellow communists to marginalize anyone who brings up an issue that hurts their cause. As most people know, those who question Mr. Obama’s legitimacy to meet the requirements of the office of the President of the United States are routinely called “Birthers,” “Racists,” “Conspiracy Nuts” or some other derogatory names, which is right out of Saul Alinsky’s communist playbook ‘Rules for Radicals.’ Mr. Obama’s eligibility is a legitimate issue from the standpoint of what the Constitution says in Article 2. The apparent multiple uses of forged documents are criminal actions, not minor discrepancies to be ignored and should never be considered, as Rep Flake said, just “a distraction.”
I think that both the American media and the Republican Party’s national leadership are ignoring this issue for some unknown reason and both institutions are doing great harm to the foundation of our constitutional republic by marginalizing and ignoring the criminal and unconstitutional violations, and then attacking anyone who dares to bring up this very important issue.
The Republican candidate for president, whoever he or she may be, as well as the Republican Party and our Republican elected officials must be willing to stand tall on this issue. The Republican candidate for president must publically and with great fanfare produce an all encompassing release for all his birth, educational, financial and government employment records and demand that Barack Obama do the same and hammer him on this issue.
The Republicans also need to drop their limp-wristed, weakling-type approach to the criminal use of forged documents by the president of the United States and come out fighting with a “Jesse Ventura - no holds barred” type of attack on the issue. The law-abiding, constitutional supporting people of America are waiting for the Republicans to do something about it.
If the Republican presidential candidate, the Republican Party at the national level and our Republican elected officials fail to take any action on this issue in 2012, then the people will know that the fix is in and the American Republic is in deeper trouble than we previously thought.
Has anyone recently heard the national Republican Party leaders, Republican congressional leadership, any of the remaining presidential candidates, or the national media speaking out about the compelling technical evidence uncovered by the Arizona Sheriff’s investigative team to conclude that the birth certificate image White House officials uploaded on the White House website on April 27, 2011, did not originate in a paper format, but was rather created (forged) as an Adobe electronic file on a computer? Yet, the Republican leadership in this country, both in and out of elective office, has refused to pursue this constitutional issue as well as the apparent criminal violation of our laws. Why?
Investigation by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office also determined that the social security number that Barack Obama is using belonged to a now deceased Connecticut man who happened to die in Hawaii when Obama’s grandmother worked in the probate office and would have access to that man’s number and other information. The social security number currently used by the president has also been checked against the national E-Verify system to see if it is a legitimate number and it comes back as a fraudulent number. Using a false social security number is a federal crime. Yet, the Republican leadership in this country has refused to pursue this constitutional issue as well as the apparent criminal violation of our laws. Why?
Investigation by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has also found out that the stamp on Mr. Obama’s selective service card appears to be a forgery, but the Selective Service has refused to cooperate with the Sheriff’s Office or produce the original document for review by experts. Has any Republican party leader or elected official spoken out about this possible additional crime that has been committed by using a forged stamp on the president’s Selective Service registration card, or the refusal of a federal government agency to cooperate in a criminal investigation?
Have you heard Republican Party leaders or Republican elective officials speaking out about the discovery by Sheriff Arpaio’s investigative team that immigration files in the National Archives recording overseas arrivals into Hawaii are missing from the week of Obama’s 1961 birthday? Or about the retired mailman’s affidavit attesting that the mother of ex-Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers enthusiastically told him that she helped pay for “foreign student” Barack Obama’s education. Why the silence?
Even in the UK, people are questioning Obama’s eligibility. Lord Christopher Monckton, the former policy adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, recently said of Obama: “What he has done on the White House website is he has put up a document which he is plainly a forgery and I would regard that as a very serious matter.” Monckton added. “The point is that if I were you, I would want to make absolutely sure that he was born (in America) before allowing him to be elected. And the birth certificate that he put up on that website, I don’t know where he was born. But I do know that birth certificate isn’t genuine.” Why doesn’t the Republican leadership in this country also consider it a serious matter?
At a recent meeting of the Red Mountain Tea Party, Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., was asked by a reporter, Tom Ballantyne, that in light of all of the information coming forward regarding the forged and missing documents concerning Mr. Obama’s background, if he thought Mr. Obama was still eligible to be president. In a typical professional politician answer, Rep. Flake said: “I think Mr. Obama is our president. I think he was duly elected, and I believe he is a citizen. And I do believe the eligibility question is a distraction,” Flake added. “My job is to make sure we beat him in November.”
I find it hard to believe that Barack Obama is still refusing to provide proper documents regarding his identity, or any other background information, six months before the next presidential election and that the Republican party and Republican congressional leaders refuse to even talk about the issue. We know nothing about this man. Mr. Obama was in Pakistan in the early 1980’s when that country was listed as a terrorist state and Americans were not allowed to travel there. He obviously could not have been there on an American passport and there is no record of him having an American passport at that time. How did he get there and what passport was he using?
It is the sworn duty of Congress to uphold the Constitution and hold the executive branch accountable to the people. Why aren’t the Republicans in congress investigating this? How come some federal agencies aren’t investigating? We are dealing with clear violations of federal laws here. Why are the Republicans and everybody else avoiding the issue? Is it because the president is Black that they are afraid to take on this issue because they will be called racists?
The Republican Party is letting the Democrat-Socialist Party and their cohorts in the American liberal media control the issue. Their strategy is a simple one. It is clearly in line with the teachings of American communist Saul Alinsky, who instructs his fellow communists to marginalize anyone who brings up an issue that hurts their cause. As most people know, those who question Mr. Obama’s legitimacy to meet the requirements of the office of the President of the United States are routinely called “Birthers,” “Racists,” “Conspiracy Nuts” or some other derogatory names, which is right out of Saul Alinsky’s communist playbook ‘Rules for Radicals.’ Mr. Obama’s eligibility is a legitimate issue from the standpoint of what the Constitution says in Article 2. The apparent multiple uses of forged documents are criminal actions, not minor discrepancies to be ignored and should never be considered, as Rep Flake said, just “a distraction.”
I think that both the American media and the Republican Party’s national leadership are ignoring this issue for some unknown reason and both institutions are doing great harm to the foundation of our constitutional republic by marginalizing and ignoring the criminal and unconstitutional violations, and then attacking anyone who dares to bring up this very important issue.
The Republican candidate for president, whoever he or she may be, as well as the Republican Party and our Republican elected officials must be willing to stand tall on this issue. The Republican candidate for president must publically and with great fanfare produce an all encompassing release for all his birth, educational, financial and government employment records and demand that Barack Obama do the same and hammer him on this issue.
The Republicans also need to drop their limp-wristed, weakling-type approach to the criminal use of forged documents by the president of the United States and come out fighting with a “Jesse Ventura - no holds barred” type of attack on the issue. The law-abiding, constitutional supporting people of America are waiting for the Republicans to do something about it.
If the Republican presidential candidate, the Republican Party at the national level and our Republican elected officials fail to take any action on this issue in 2012, then the people will know that the fix is in and the American Republic is in deeper trouble than we previously thought.
Has anyone recently heard the national Republican Party leaders, Republican congressional leadership, any of the remaining presidential candidates, or the national media speaking out about the compelling technical evidence uncovered by the Arizona Sheriff’s investigative team to conclude that the birth certificate image White House officials uploaded on the White House website on April 27, 2011, did not originate in a paper format, but was rather created (forged) as an Adobe electronic file on a computer? Yet, the Republican leadership in this country, both in and out of elective office, has refused to pursue this constitutional issue as well as the apparent criminal violation of our laws. Why?
Investigation by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office also determined that the social security number that Barack Obama is using belonged to a now deceased Connecticut man who happened to die in Hawaii when Obama’s grandmother worked in the probate office and would have access to that man’s number and other information. The social security number currently used by the president has also been checked against the national E-Verify system to see if it is a legitimate number and it comes back as a fraudulent number. Using a false social security number is a federal crime. Yet, the Republican leadership in this country has refused to pursue this constitutional issue as well as the apparent criminal violation of our laws. Why?
Investigation by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has also found out that the stamp on Mr. Obama’s selective service card appears to be a forgery, but the Selective Service has refused to cooperate with the Sheriff’s Office or produce the original document for review by experts. Has any Republican party leader or elected official spoken out about this possible additional crime that has been committed by using a forged stamp on the president’s Selective Service registration card, or the refusal of a federal government agency to cooperate in a criminal investigation?
Have you heard Republican Party leaders or Republican elective officials speaking out about the discovery by Sheriff Arpaio’s investigative team that immigration files in the National Archives recording overseas arrivals into Hawaii are missing from the week of Obama’s 1961 birthday? Or about the retired mailman’s affidavit attesting that the mother of ex-Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers enthusiastically told him that she helped pay for “foreign student” Barack Obama’s education. Why the silence?
Even in the UK, people are questioning Obama’s eligibility. Lord Christopher Monckton, the former policy adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, recently said of Obama: “What he has done on the White House website is he has put up a document which he is plainly a forgery and I would regard that as a very serious matter.” Monckton added. “The point is that if I were you, I would want to make absolutely sure that he was born (in America) before allowing him to be elected. And the birth certificate that he put up on that website, I don’t know where he was born. But I do know that birth certificate isn’t genuine.” Why doesn’t the Republican leadership in this country also consider it a serious matter?
At a recent meeting of the Red Mountain Tea Party, Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., was asked by a reporter, Tom Ballantyne, that in light of all of the information coming forward regarding the forged and missing documents concerning Mr. Obama’s background, if he thought Mr. Obama was still eligible to be president. In a typical professional politician answer, Rep. Flake said: “I think Mr. Obama is our president. I think he was duly elected, and I believe he is a citizen. And I do believe the eligibility question is a distraction,” Flake added. “My job is to make sure we beat him in November.”
I find it hard to believe that Barack Obama is still refusing to provide proper documents regarding his identity, or any other background information, six months before the next presidential election and that the Republican party and Republican congressional leaders refuse to even talk about the issue. We know nothing about this man. Mr. Obama was in Pakistan in the early 1980’s when that country was listed as a terrorist state and Americans were not allowed to travel there. He obviously could not have been there on an American passport and there is no record of him having an American passport at that time. How did he get there and what passport was he using?
It is the sworn duty of Congress to uphold the Constitution and hold the executive branch accountable to the people. Why aren’t the Republicans in congress investigating this? How come some federal agencies aren’t investigating? We are dealing with clear violations of federal laws here. Why are the Republicans and everybody else avoiding the issue? Is it because the president is Black that they are afraid to take on this issue because they will be called racists?
The Republican Party is letting the Democrat-Socialist Party and their cohorts in the American liberal media control the issue. Their strategy is a simple one. It is clearly in line with the teachings of American communist Saul Alinsky, who instructs his fellow communists to marginalize anyone who brings up an issue that hurts their cause. As most people know, those who question Mr. Obama’s legitimacy to meet the requirements of the office of the President of the United States are routinely called “Birthers,” “Racists,” “Conspiracy Nuts” or some other derogatory names, which is right out of Saul Alinsky’s communist playbook ‘Rules for Radicals.’ Mr. Obama’s eligibility is a legitimate issue from the standpoint of what the Constitution says in Article 2. The apparent multiple uses of forged documents are criminal actions, not minor discrepancies to be ignored and should never be considered, as Rep Flake said, just “a distraction.”
I think that both the American media and the Republican Party’s national leadership are ignoring this issue for some unknown reason and both institutions are doing great harm to the foundation of our constitutional republic by marginalizing and ignoring the criminal and unconstitutional violations, and then attacking anyone who dares to bring up this very important issue.
The Republican candidate for president, whoever he or she may be, as well as the Republican Party and our Republican elected officials must be willing to stand tall on this issue. The Republican candidate for president must publically and with great fanfare produce an all encompassing release for all his birth, educational, financial and government employment records and demand that Barack Obama do the same and hammer him on this issue.
The Republicans also need to drop their limp-wristed, weakling-type approach to the criminal use of forged documents by the president of the United States and come out fighting with a “Jesse Ventura - no holds barred” type of attack on the issue. The law-abiding, constitutional supporting people of America are waiting for the Republicans to do something about it.
If the Republican presidential candidate, the Republican Party at the national level and our Republican elected officials fail to take any action on this issue in 2012, then the people will know that the fix is in and the American Republic is in deeper trouble than we previously thought.
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
WHITES-ONLY RACIST GROUP FORMS TO ELECT WHITE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT
by John Wallace
A Whites-Only racist group has just formed with the primary goal of electing a White Republican President in the upcoming presidential election. How can this be allowed to happen in America in 2012. Why would Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich or Ron Paul even accept the help of a group whose sole membership is limited to white people. Would they not be considered racists themselves? How could they even consider being supported by an organization that called themselves "White People for ------------."
The Republican will surely face the outrage from the NAACP, the Congressional Black Caucus (a racist blacks-only organization supported by the American taxpayer), the Obama sock puppets in the lame stream media, and other assorted Democrat-Socialists across the country. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will surely mobilize their "rent-a-mobs" to protest the racism and make a few bucks along the way.
Oh wait a minute. I made a mistake!
It's not a 'whites-only' racist organization such as "White People for '----------'" that has been formed, it is a 'blacks-only' racist organization that has been formed to re-elect Barack Obama. Yes, Mr. Obama is once again playing the race card and has formed “African Americans for Obama” – and where is the outcry from the press?. Where's the outrage over this racist pandering by the president?
'
This clearly racist organization is planning a program that will recruit only black people to volunteer their time by making telephone calls and going door-to-door in black neighborhoods encouraging blacks to vote for the black president.
Just think about what is going on in America in 2012:
It is alright to have a NAACP but we cannot have a NAAWP because it would be a racist organization.
It is alright to “Support your United Negro College Fund” but you cannot have a “Support your United White College Fund” because it would be racist.
It is alright to have a "Black Congressional Caucus" but you cannot have a "White Congressional Caucus" because it would be racist.
It is alright to have a "Black History Month" but you cannot have a "White History Month" because it would be racist.
It is alright to have a "Black Entertainment Network" but you cannot have a "White Entertainment Network" because that would be racist.
Somehow, in 2012 America, it is OK to have a “African Americans for Obama” organization, but just try to have a “White Americans for ---------” and see what would happen. The socialist, lame stream media and a host of black only organizations would force the “right-wing extremist” out of the race within 24 hours.
It's time to end the double standard that exists in America today. We must stop classifying ourselves by race, because it only separates us as a nation. Its time for America to become the land of un-hyphenated Americans where racial politics is no longer acceptable, no matter who does it.
----------------------------
Link to my original article: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_31593.php
A Whites-Only racist group has just formed with the primary goal of electing a White Republican President in the upcoming presidential election. How can this be allowed to happen in America in 2012. Why would Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich or Ron Paul even accept the help of a group whose sole membership is limited to white people. Would they not be considered racists themselves? How could they even consider being supported by an organization that called themselves "White People for ------------."
The Republican will surely face the outrage from the NAACP, the Congressional Black Caucus (a racist blacks-only organization supported by the American taxpayer), the Obama sock puppets in the lame stream media, and other assorted Democrat-Socialists across the country. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will surely mobilize their "rent-a-mobs" to protest the racism and make a few bucks along the way.
Oh wait a minute. I made a mistake!
It's not a 'whites-only' racist organization such as "White People for '----------'" that has been formed, it is a 'blacks-only' racist organization that has been formed to re-elect Barack Obama. Yes, Mr. Obama is once again playing the race card and has formed “African Americans for Obama” – and where is the outcry from the press?. Where's the outrage over this racist pandering by the president?
'
This clearly racist organization is planning a program that will recruit only black people to volunteer their time by making telephone calls and going door-to-door in black neighborhoods encouraging blacks to vote for the black president.
Just think about what is going on in America in 2012:
It is alright to have a NAACP but we cannot have a NAAWP because it would be a racist organization.
It is alright to “Support your United Negro College Fund” but you cannot have a “Support your United White College Fund” because it would be racist.
It is alright to have a "Black Congressional Caucus" but you cannot have a "White Congressional Caucus" because it would be racist.
It is alright to have a "Black History Month" but you cannot have a "White History Month" because it would be racist.
It is alright to have a "Black Entertainment Network" but you cannot have a "White Entertainment Network" because that would be racist.
Somehow, in 2012 America, it is OK to have a “African Americans for Obama” organization, but just try to have a “White Americans for ---------” and see what would happen. The socialist, lame stream media and a host of black only organizations would force the “right-wing extremist” out of the race within 24 hours.
It's time to end the double standard that exists in America today. We must stop classifying ourselves by race, because it only separates us as a nation. Its time for America to become the land of un-hyphenated Americans where racial politics is no longer acceptable, no matter who does it.
----------------------------
Link to my original article: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_31593.php
Thursday, February 23, 2012
THE INTOLERABLE ACTS OF 1774 AND 2012
On November 29, 1773, a group of angry American colonists threw several tons of British tea overboard into the Boston, Massachusetts harbor, which became known as the Boston Tea Party. The colonists took this action because the British Parliament had eliminated the taxes on tea distributed by the British owned East India Company in order to save the company from bankruptcy (think bailouts of Chrysler, GM, Wall Street firms, banks and numerous Solar companies today), which made British East India Co tea a lot less expensive than Colonial tea because the colonists were still required to pay the tax on their tea.
King George III and the British Parliament responded to the Boston Tea Party with a series of laws (Intolerable Acts) that they passed in 1774 severely reducing and almost eliminating the amount of self-government permissible in the American colonies. The acts sparked outrage and led to increased resistance throughout the 13 colonies to the tyranny of King George III and the British government. When the First Continental Congress was convened on September 5, 1774 in Philadelphia, the delegates pledged to support Massachusetts in case it was attacked by the British army. Eventually, all of the colonies would become involved when the American Revolutionary War began at Lexington and Concord on April 18, 1775.
Throughout the history of mankind, when people were hungry, they went out and hunted for food, fished or planted crops to grow and eat. Somewhere along the line in America, these simple acts of hunting, fishing, planting crops, etc gradually became subject to the issuance of a license or required compliance with a regulation created by some government entity. There was a time in America when citizens did not need a license to hunt, to fish, to get married, to own a gun or to build a house. Now the people need licenses for all these things and much more. It should be noted that George Washington and Abraham Lincoln didn’t have marriage licenses because these license requirements didn’t exist when they were alive.
As our federal government (and to a lesser degree our state and local governments) began to grow and expand in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, they needed more money so they passed mandatory income tax laws, introduced license fees, gasoline taxes, school taxes, sales taxes and thousands of other taxes, resulting in a significant loss of Liberty that has effectively enslaved the free people of America causing them to work a certain number of days every year just to pay for their governments, which now approaches almost six months of the year.
An increasing number of Federal, State and local government bureaucrats now determine how much liberty and freedom the American people will have when it comes to everyday things such as driving your car, farming your land, eating out, building a house, running your business, hiring employees, how much you must pay them, what kind of health benefits you must provide, how much you can inherit when a relative dies, etc. etc. etc. We sometimes do not see the true extent of the gradual loss of our Liberty and freedoms because the American people are being attacked from a hundred different directions at once by new laws, new restrictions, new regulations, new taxes and fees.
Whether the government is taxing our income, issuing fiat money, re-distributing our wealth, giving free health care and education to illegal aliens, over regulating businesses and farms, issuing deliberately false information to the American people on unemployment statistics, inflation or global warming, subsidizing ethanol production or guaranteeing loans to political cronies who have invested in phony solar companies that are going bankrupt, each one of these actions reduces our individual Liberty.
I know that some loss of individual liberty is necessary for maintaining the social order on which our other liberties depend. We need to have criminals arrested when they break the law. We need to secure our country’s borders. We need to have a strong military for defense and we need to pay enough taxes to pay our police and military and to perform other constitutional functions. However, beyond what is authorized in the constitution, the loss of Liberty begins when the federal government unconstitutionally expands their functions while imposing huge costs on American citizens, without any offsetting social benefits.
Many of our state and local governments have also been attacking your Liberty and freedom of choice. The NYC Board of Health voted to adopt the nation's first city-wide outright ban on the use of trans-fats in restaurant cooking, because Mayor Bloomberg deemed it unhealthy. State and federal agencies now issue their own regulations, without state legislative or congressional approval, and have set out to criminalize the sale of raw milk and put small family farms and ranches out of business. Forget the war of crime and drugs, the food police in San Francisco have banned Happy Meals and in North Carolina recently, a 5 year old girl wasn’t allowed by a government health bureaucrat to eat a nutritious lunch prepared by her mother. Instead, she was given Chicken nuggets to eat.
The total amount of water that flushes in your toilet and even the ordinary light bulb, have now come under the firm control of federal government bureaucrats. Your right to buy a simple light bulb, buy a toilet for your bathroom, prepare your child’s lunch or eat certain foods in a restaurant has been taken from us. Our progressive, socialist tyrants in various government bureaucracies always thought they knew what was better for you than you did, only now they have given themselves the power to make you do what they want you to do. These actions are all unconstitutional and they all have gradually chipped away at our Liberty.
The passage of Obama-inspired health care reform bill took, from all Americans, another huge chunk of Liberty and has provided very little in return. With one stroke of a pen, for the first time in history, American citizens were mandated to buy a specific product – health insurance – or face a fine or worse. Of course, many private and public sector unions, teacher unions and other politically connected institutions that support big government received waivers. The rest of us must conform, or else face the consequences.
Most recently, our federal government has passed laws that are easily as dangerous to our Liberty and freedoms as any of the ‘Intolerable Acts’ passed by the British government in the 1770’s that caused our founding fathers to take up arms and reassert their Liberty. The latest of these is the recently enacted National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA). President Barack Obama signed the NDAA into law on New Year's Eve 2011, granting himself absolute power to deploy the armed forces of the United States against American citizens.
The new law allows the federal government to “indefinitely detain” American citizens suspected (by the federal government) of being "terrorists" (not defined) without the guaranteed rights of the 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th Amendments of the United States Constitution. No right to an attorney, no right to bail, no right to trial, no phone call, no right to confront your accusers, no rights at all. It is totally unconstitutional, yet it came from our elected representatives and was signed by our president who ignored the unconstitutional nature of the bill. You must remember that this type of legislation is something that dictators, tyrants and communist governments need in place to justify their power and to control the people.
President Obama has also recently issued a mandate to the Catholic Church and other religious groups that they must provide certain birth control and abortion drugs to their employees free of charge even it is against their religious beliefs, which of course is a violation of the First Amendment of the constitution. President Obama’s mandates and executive orders are beginning to sound a lot like the mandates of King George III, back in 1774. The U.S. federal government, for many decades, has been encroaching on and trampling on our constitutional guaranteed rights much the same as King George III and the British parliament did in the 1770’s. It is now perfectly clear to many Americans that our federal government, rather than protecting our rights as is required in a Republic, has clearly declared war on the constitutionally guaranteed rights of the American people.
My fellow American citizens, when Presidents of the United States issue unconstitutional and illegal executive orders, when federal judges unconstitutionally and illegally make law from their benches and when our elected representatives in congress pass laws that are unconstitutional and illegal attacks on our Liberty and Freedoms, should not these orders and laws also be considered ‘Intolerable Acts’ against the free people of America?
If your answer to that question is yes, then I have a second question for you.
What are you going to do about it?
Monday, January 30, 2012
PEEING ON A TALIBAN
If some unwashed athiest swine pees on a Crucifix, or smears feces on a picture of the Virgin Mary at a taxpayer funded exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, the liberal elite and their socialist media friends will call him an Artist.
If some communist socialist dirtbag pees on the American Flag in public, the liberal elite and their socialist media friends will say he is exercising his free speech rights under the Constitution!
If some grungy, Occupy Wall Street, MoveOn.org Marxist, decides to pee on a NYCPD patrol car, the liberal elite and their media friends will call that person a 'Freedom Loving 99 percenter.'
But just have four brave U.S. Marines pee on a dead Taliban terrorist who just tried to kill them and their fellow marines, and these same liberal elite and their socialist media friends will call them "Villains" and demand that the most serious charges possible be brought against them.
The Taliban have beheaded Americans, gutted and hung their captives and we are supposed to be upset by a few marines peeing on a Tabiban.
We bet most of these liberal Elites, their socialist media friends and many of the current high ranking people in the current administration and congress, who are so upset with the conduct of the marines, have never even been in a fistfight and most of them couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag if they wanted to, so don't listen to them. Most of them have never faced real danger.
Admonish the Marines Yes - Punish them NO!
As a society of active and former military personnal and police officers, we salute these four U.S. Marines and say: “Judge them not, lest ye be judged!”
Congratulate them and honor them for protecting us against one of the most vicious ememies we have ever fought and hope that they learn to keep their cameras off.
The Blue Templars
http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_363_31476.php
Saturday, January 21, 2012
THE ANT AND THE GRASSHOPPER - TWO VERSIONS OF AN OLD FABLE
THE TRADITIONAL CONSERVATIVE VERSION:
The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.
The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed.
The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.
MORAL OF THE OLD STORY: Be responsible for yourself!
---------------------------------------------------
THE PROGRESSIVE-SOCIALIST VERSION
The ant works hard in the withering heat and the rain all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.
The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
Come winter, the shiveringgrasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while he is cold and starving.
CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.
America is stunned by the sharp contrast. How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so?
Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah's Show with the grasshopper and everybody cries when they sing,'It's Not EasyBeing Green...'
Occupy the Anthill stages a demonstration in front of the ant's house where the news stations film the SEIU group singing, We shall overcome.
Then Rev. Jeremiah Wright has the group kneel down to pray for the grasshopper's sake, while he damns the ants.
President Obama condems the ant and blames President Bush 43, President Bush 41, President Reagan, Christopher Columbus, Sarah Palin and the Pope for the grasshopper's plight..
Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid exclaim in an interview with Larry King that the ant has
gotten ric h off the back of the grasshopper, and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share.
Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer.
The ant is fined for not having a formal Affirmative Action program and for not hiringe a correct proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the GovernmentGreenCzar
and given to the grasshopper.
The story ends as we see thegrasshopper and his free-loading friends finishing up the last bits of the ant's food while the government house he is in, which, as you recall, just happens to be the ant's old house, crumbles around them because thegrasshopper doesn't maintain it.
The ant has disappeared in the snow, never to be seen again.
The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident, and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the ramshackle, once prosperous and peaceful, neighborhood.
The entire Nation collapses bringing the rest of the free world with it.
MORAL OF THE STORY:
Be careful how you vote in 2012.
I've posted this article because I believe that you are an ant, not a grasshopper!
Make sure that you pass this on to other taxpaying ants.
Don't bother sending it on to any grasshoppers because they wouldn't understand it, anyway
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
JOHN WALLACE RADIO: THE FEDERAL RESERVE CARTEL AND THE EIGHT FAMILIES THAT RULE THE WORLD
My Show this Wednesday - January 18th at 6:00PM EST
My guest this week is Mr. Dean Henderson, the author of "Big Oil and Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network." Through extensive research, Mr. Henderson has pulled back the covers to expose a centuries-old cabal of global oligarchs, whose hegemony over the global economy is based on control of the planet’s three most valuable commodities: oil, guns and drugs- combined with ownership of the world’s central banks.
Henderson has uncovered evidence that implicates these oligarchs in orchestrating a string of conspiracies from Pearl Harbor to the Kennedy Assassination to 911. He has followed the trail of dirty money up the food chain to the interbred Eight Families who - from their City of London base - control the Four Horsemen of Oil, the global drug trade and the permanent war economy. Mr. Henderson has managfed to shine a giant spotlight on the Money Power that secretively rules the world.
He identifies the Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) and shows how they own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch. According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation in the world. Tune in to find out the truth, or call in to tell me what's on your mind; and of course, there is more ...............
SHOW LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: 646-200-0326
If you want to call in live and speak to the host, while the show is on the air, dial the above number. You will be placed into the caller queue where you will still be able to hear the show while you are on hold. You can also listen to the show on your I-phone or other cell phones. If you would rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.
Click on the link below to go to the show website
www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace
For Liberty,
John Wallace
My guest this week is Mr. Dean Henderson, the author of "Big Oil and Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network." Through extensive research, Mr. Henderson has pulled back the covers to expose a centuries-old cabal of global oligarchs, whose hegemony over the global economy is based on control of the planet’s three most valuable commodities: oil, guns and drugs- combined with ownership of the world’s central banks.
Henderson has uncovered evidence that implicates these oligarchs in orchestrating a string of conspiracies from Pearl Harbor to the Kennedy Assassination to 911. He has followed the trail of dirty money up the food chain to the interbred Eight Families who - from their City of London base - control the Four Horsemen of Oil, the global drug trade and the permanent war economy. Mr. Henderson has managfed to shine a giant spotlight on the Money Power that secretively rules the world.
He identifies the Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) and shows how they own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch. According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation in the world. Tune in to find out the truth, or call in to tell me what's on your mind; and of course, there is more ...............
SHOW LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: 646-200-0326
If you want to call in live and speak to the host, while the show is on the air, dial the above number. You will be placed into the caller queue where you will still be able to hear the show while you are on hold. You can also listen to the show on your I-phone or other cell phones. If you would rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.
Click on the link below to go to the show website
www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace
For Liberty,
John Wallace
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




